Superstar Rajnikanth - Silencing the critics
He was always criticized for acting with heroines very younger than his age. Before that he was severely criticized for flipping cigarettes onscreen and thereby misleading the youth. With his decisions, now both were muted. By stopping flipping cigarettes he did a good for onscreen followers and didnt give an edge for his distractors to take undue advantage over him and avoided business tensions during film releases.
By choosing to act in new director's or so called young director's film, the heroin problem was also solved. For his film after lingaa, the character he enacted was not a run-to-mill hero character but of mostly upper middle age. Be it Kabali, Kaala and Petta this is a mature decision. By acting in Kalaa, he also silenced a set of critic who questioned why he didnt taking up portraying another section in the society. Kalaa is a equalizer sorts of all questions like this.
And if observed carefully, 2.0 ran well without a single song in the movie, except in the credits.
A top star has already been set an example for this, a film without songs. Anyone noticed that.....?
And what else he has to face from the critics.....?
The real problem in the society is there has been no patience for waiting to see what is going to happen and a sort of authoritarianism tops like the actors should do what the critics are expecting or the political class is blackmailing to threaten their businesses.
Questioning is right....Criticisizing is right....Throwing tantrums is right....but please.....let them do their job ..... for them to perform or to align ....or to realize....give them some time...and dont forget to appreciate when it is done.
Obviously if you do so, it wont fetch you the first page news or the limelight which you expect....the appreciations or the acknowledgement of accomplishment.
Superstar Rajni.......sir...you are great Thalaiva...
By choosing to act in new director's or so called young director's film, the heroin problem was also solved. For his film after lingaa, the character he enacted was not a run-to-mill hero character but of mostly upper middle age. Be it Kabali, Kaala and Petta this is a mature decision. By acting in Kalaa, he also silenced a set of critic who questioned why he didnt taking up portraying another section in the society. Kalaa is a equalizer sorts of all questions like this.
And if observed carefully, 2.0 ran well without a single song in the movie, except in the credits.
A top star has already been set an example for this, a film without songs. Anyone noticed that.....?
And what else he has to face from the critics.....?
The real problem in the society is there has been no patience for waiting to see what is going to happen and a sort of authoritarianism tops like the actors should do what the critics are expecting or the political class is blackmailing to threaten their businesses.
Questioning is right....Criticisizing is right....Throwing tantrums is right....but please.....let them do their job ..... for them to perform or to align ....or to realize....give them some time...and dont forget to appreciate when it is done.
Obviously if you do so, it wont fetch you the first page news or the limelight which you expect....the appreciations or the acknowledgement of accomplishment.
Superstar Rajni.......sir...you are great Thalaiva...
Comments